CMD Group is a ConstructConnect® company. Learn more

How the Subprime Mortgage Mess Began

02/14/2008 by Jim Haughey


The federal government made the subprime mortgage mess inevitable when it imposed social engineering rules on private mortgage contracts. The long process began with the 1975 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and the regulatory bureaucracy that these two legislative acts required.

Over the next thirty years, the subprime mortgage market emerged, banks and S&L’s shifted half of their mortgage lending to lines of credit to mortgage brokers not covered by HMDA and CRA and federal bank regulators ignored poor underwriting practices as long as the HMDA statistics showed a rising acceptance rates for mortgage applications for low income and minority households.

The HMDA required banks and other regulated mortgage lenders to report mortgage application acceptances and rejections by the race, age, sex, income and the geographic location of the applicants. This was in response to charges that some lenders had “redlined” poor and minority neighborhoods, refusing to approve mortgages in neighborhoods where they believed people typically had poor credit and home price appreciation was relatively low.

The first set of HMDA statistics showed a lower acceptance rate for low income and minority mortgage applications and led to the enactment of the CRA. This legislation required banks and other regulated mortgage lenders to show improving performance in accepting low income and minority mortgage applications in semiannual audits or face rejection by bank regulators of their requests to open branch banks, acquire another bank or take any action subject to regulatory approval.

The law allowed any community group to object to bank actions requiring regulatory approval if the group believed a bank had an unacceptable record in mortgage lending. The consequence was that a bizarre process emerged in which banks seeking regulatory approval for any expansion plans had to negotiate with community groups and reach an agreement to loosen underwriting standards for low income and minority mortgage applications.

These agreements often included setting up a mortgage fund that would only lend to low income and minority applicants. This often was accompanied by opening offices in low income and minority neighborhoods, providing mortgage application and foreclosure counseling, donations and subsidized loans to community groups and lowering downpayment and income verification requirements. Banks reluctantly accepted this as a cost of doing business in the profitable markets for prime mortgages.

The number of subprime, CRA or “affordable” mortgage loans increased progressively for twenty years but remained well below 10% of the mortgage market. The default rate was several times higher than for prime mortgages but the total default cost was not large enough to threaten the profitability of the overall mortgage business.

Then a 1995 amendment to the CRA permitted securitization of these loans. This changed everything. The bond market could now be tapped to fund CRA loans. Investment bankers very profitably packaged CRA mortgages for bond buyers. As incredible as it now seems, these bonds were rated AAA, making this new source of mortgage funds very inexpensive and “OK” to buy by public and pension funds restricted by law to top rated bonds and other investment funds that shunned low rated bonds.

The AAA rating was an illusion that was ignored by bank regulators, the overseers of pension funds and the Securities and Exchange Commission. How were the bonds rated AAA? The bond rating companies and the bond insurers did not have easy access to the individual mortgages. Absent this they relied on the guarantees provided the banks that pooled the mortgages and sold the bonds to finance them. Often banks created “off the books” paper entities, shielded from their regulators and stockholders. Isn’t this what Enron did?

The illusion was that bond insurers and the banks that packaged the mortgages could meet their commitments to bondholders if the foreclosure rate moved well above the low historic rate. But the historic rate was from an economic environment with ever rising home prices, building equity for mortgage holders, minimal outright fraud by mortgage applicants and mortgage lenders and brokers, no teaser introductory mortgage rates and loose but not absent income verification standards.

The subprime, CRA or affordable mortgage market began to expand very quickly. Everybody was a winner. Low income households got to buy a home. Mortgage brokers, bond raters, bond insurers, real estate brokers and mortgage packagers all got more commissions. CRA auditors were pleased that low income and minority households got better access to mortgages.

To generate more mortgage paper and hence more commissions, mortgage brokers and banks progressively lowered underwriting standards with the tacit approval of CRA auditors and community groups. This spawned no downpayment and no income documentation loans. It was sufficient that an applicant with a poor credit record and income too low or too insecure was taking a credit counseling course.

From the late 1990s into 2005, the subprime share of mortgage lending exploded from about 5-6% to over 20% and was substantially responsible for the double-digit gains in home prices a few years ago. Then prime mortgage borrowers balked at buying homes with prices twice as high as normal in relation to income.

Prices began to decline. You know the rest of the story as it unfolded in the last two years.

Washington is doing very little to deal with the root causes of the subprime mortgage mess. Belatedly, fraudulent practices by mortgage lenders are being prohibited and a few people will go to prison. But these fraudulent practices appeared, and were long tolerated, only after Washington set the eventual mortgage mess in play by insisting that some people were entitled to be homeowners even if they could not afford to buy a home with the rules set by private lenders. Instead, Washington is forcing lenders to provide further subsidies to loans in default. This may be politically correct, especially in an election year, but it assures a similar problem will occur again.

Recent Comments

Jim Haughey blames the subprime debacle on Washington's insistence that "some people were entitled to be homeowners even if they could not afford to buy a home with the rules set by private lenders". Yet his own history shows this good intention was not the cause. He says for twenty year under the relaxed lending rules "the total default cost was not large enough to threaten the profitability of the overall mortgage business." The problem, as he notes, arose from a 1995 amendment to Community Reinvestment Act and rating services subsequently giving AAA ratings to bonds that did not deserve it. He blames the ratings on deceptive "guarantees provided the banks". If banks see expanding home ownership to lower income groups as an opportunity for deceptive business practices, he should blame the banks, not the government policy.
L. Bancroft -
Feb 16 4:24 AM
Mr. Haughey would have us believe that there is some relation between the rise and fall of housing prices and low income borrowers getting mortgages they cannot afford. A moment's reflection would tell him that low income borrowers buy homes in low income areas. A rise in housing prices in those areas would have little effect on housing prices where affluent borrowers are likely to buy. The Wall Street Journal noted in March, 2007 "a large chunk of the subprime-loan market has shifted to higher-income metropolitan areas. In many of those wealthier areas, the delinquency rate has increased quickly. In the Sacramento, Calif., region, where the median household income ranks among the top 10th of major metropolitan areas, the portion of subprime mortgages delinquent for 60 days or more hit 14.1% in December -- more than four times the level a year earlier." Clearly, subprime loans in affluent areas is far beyond the purview of HMDA and the CRA. Speculation fueled by lax lending policies is the more likely explanation for both the rise and the collapse of housing prices. It is an old story and has nothing to do with social engineering.
malton44 -
Feb 16 8:30 AM
You are both missing the point. He is saying that the social engineering led to the production of a dodgy loan type. People later used these loans to buy houses they couldn't afford (in both poor and affluent areas) and that led to a run up in housing prices. Eventually prime borrowers (ones who could have afforded the houses) balked at the prices and that led to the collapse. In other words, social engineering is the pebble that got the whole avalanche started. I'm not sure I believe the whole argument because I think that these loan vehicles would have been developed eventually without the social engineering since they shift the interest rate risk from the lender to the borrower.
khaborak -
Apr 04 8:47 AM

Article Archive

Date Article
11/17/14 Top 10 largest construction project starts in the U.S. - October 2014
11/14/14 Non-residential Construction Starts Rose Gently in October
07/10/14 The Importance of Matching Volume to Contractor Capacity in JOC Procurement Strategy
07/10/14 Consider a Seed Project as Part of Your JOC Procurement Strategy
07/10/14 The Best Unit Price Book for Your Job Order Contract
07/02/14 ECONOMIC NUGGETS – July 1, 2014
10/23/14 Twenty major upcoming Water Treatment Plants and Manufacturing & Warehousing construction projects - U.S. - October 2014
10/23/14 Twenty major upcoming Alberta and British Columbia construction projects - Canada - October 2014
10/15/14 Trend lines of construction starts in Canada - September 2014
10/15/14 Top 10 largest construction project starts in Canada - September 2014
09/17/14 Twenty major upcoming midwest and northwest construction projects - U.S. - September 2014
09/17/14 Twenty major upcoming medical and educational construction projects - Canada - September 2014
09/17/14 Trend lines of construction starts in Canada - August 2014
09/17/14 Top 10 largest construction project starts in Canada - August 2014
08/15/14 Twenty major upcoming medical and educational construction projects - U.S. - August 2014
08/15/14 Twenty major upcoming industrial and water treatment construction projects - Canada - July 2014
08/15/14 Trend lines of construction starts in Canada - July 2014
08/15/14 Top 10 largest construction project starts in Canada - July 2014
07/24/14 Twenty major upcoming entertainment facility and stadium/arena construction projects - U.S. - July 2014
07/24/14 Twenty major upcoming Ontario and Quebec construction projects - Canada - July 2014
07/24/14 Trend lines of construction starts in Canada - June 2014
07/24/14 Top 10 largest construction project starts in Canada - June 2014
07/14/14 Top 10 largest construction project starts in the U.S. - June 2014
02/03/14 Infographic: Where Can You Use Project Leads in the Construction Process?
07/25/13 The Canadian Economy’s Two Great Blessings
02/15/13 Construction Economic Notes – February, 2013
11/05/12 Recycled-Content Tile
10/05/12 Fiber-Cement Siding
09/18/12 Return on Your Green Home Improvement Investment
08/09/12 Green Building Solutions to Stormwater Runoff
08/07/12 An “Aha” Moment Solves Challenge of Cost Estimating Local Circus Roof
07/19/12 Estimate Types
06/20/12 Ground-Source Heat Pump
05/14/12 Universal Design for Outdoor Living
04/23/12 What Is Universal Design?
04/09/12 Natural Landscaping
03/14/12 Green Material Alternatives for Plumbing Fixtures
03/02/12 Budgeting & Financing Green Construction
02/22/12 Greening Your Firm
02/10/12 Roofing Defects
02/06/12 Roofs: energy efficiency strategies
01/18/12 Commercial Real Estate and Green Construction
12/14/11 Renewable Energy & Distributed Generation Technologies
11/04/11 Tubular Skylights
10/04/11 Are Online Ads An Endangered Species?
09/27/11 Performance Bonds Guarantee Clients Receive Exceptional Service
09/15/11 Deconstruction for Green and Economic Benefit
09/01/11 4 Ways for Businesses to Create a Good First Impression on Twitter
08/11/11 Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Green Building
07/21/11 Green Alternatives for Concrete
07/12/11 Evaluating Products Over Their Life Cycle
06/30/11 Low-Cost Green Strategies
06/28/11 Bricks are from Venus, Clicks are from Mars
06/17/11 Zombie Avoidance Techniques for Building Product Manufacturers
06/08/11 Blogs & Websites: The 5 Signs of Website Wellness
06/06/11 Building Product Manufacturers & Green Products
06/01/11 Is Fear of Sharing Information Costing Your Company Sales?
05/26/11 What Are Green Products?
05/20/11 The Building Envelope
05/16/11 Blogging: Website Heal Thyself
05/03/11 Metals Compared to Wood for Sustainable Construction
04/12/11 Storm Water Collection & Infiltration
03/23/11 Commissioning the Green Building
02/23/11 Building Program for Green Design
01/21/11 Building Deconstruction Process
05/02/11 Why Building Product Manufacturers and Social Media Are a Marriage Made in Heaven
05/06/11 Building Product Manufacturers: How Understanding Architects Can Help Your Business
10/21/09 Distributors & Manufacturer Representatives
07/15/10 Estimating Doors: Tips from the Experts
07/06/10 How to Handle Construction Materials to Prevent Mold
06/21/10 How to Maximize the Benefits of Exterior Security Lighting
06/04/10 SmartBuilding Index
06/01/10 Regional Housing Construction Tracking and Forecast Information
05/28/10 How to Find Regional Construction Tracking and Forecast Information
05/24/10 Building Product Manufacturers
05/18/10 Practicing the Art of Sustainability - Why Atlanta's Current Building Codes Need Updating Now
02/23/10 Learning to use EE
01/11/10 Earn AIA CEU Credit Attending RCD Webcasts
07/17/09 Cost Estimators Winning Work With BIM
07/16/09 Becoming an Invited Bidder - More Tips
07/16/09 Becoming an Invited Bidder - Tips
07/16/09 Becoming an Invited Bidder
07/16/09 SmartBIM Object Modeling Guidelines for Revit
07/15/09 Interference Check and BIM
06/26/09 A Look at Contractor Failure: Part 2
06/19/09 RicciGreene Associates
06/19/09 Doug Thornton AIA, LEED A.P. of AERC, PLLC
06/18/09 A Look at Contractor Failure: Part 1
06/12/09 Owners and SmartBIM Objects – What You Need To Do
06/10/09 Dealing with the IRS
06/05/09 Getting Paid on Construction Contracts
06/02/09 BIM Coordination and Collaboration
05/28/09 Marketing Your Construction Firm on the Cheap
05/20/09 Little Habits with Big Payoffs for Contractors
05/12/09 SmartBIM Spaces
05/07/09 AIA Show Recap as Seen by the SmartBIM Solutions Team
04/27/09 Business Case Study - Survey Of Spending Patterns In Educational Facilities
04/23/09 Taking Advantage of the Recession: Hiring the Right People
04/20/09 Cork as a Green Flooring Option
04/08/09 Owners - It's Time to Substantially Increase Your Architect's and Engineer's Fees
03/05/09 There's a Solution to Performing Time Consuming Quantity Take-Offs
02/20/09 SmartBIM Library is Half-Off for a Limited Time Only
02/09/09 You are Wasting Your Money
01/20/09 Obama: 'Dramatic Action' On Economy Needed
01/14/09 Use of BIM Jumps Dramatically Over Last 12 Months
12/10/08 Minimizing the Size of Family Files (Revit Objects)
11/11/08 Maximize Online Advertising Dollars
11/07/08 Architects and Engineers, WE NEED YOU
10/29/08 Why Do You Need SmartBIM Objects
10/28/08 Why Building Information Modeling?
10/29/08 10 Questions To Ask About BIM Objects
10/08/08 The Object Mess
10/07/08 Implementing BIM to Your Office
10/06/08 Meeting the Needs for Governmental BIM Compliance while Avoiding Current Liability Obstacles
09/15/08 The BIM Transformation is Manageable with the NEW SmartBIM Library v3
09/14/08 KOLBE Windows and Doors vs. Building Information Modeling
09/12/08 The Evolution of Building Information Modeling: BIM 1-2-3
08/11/08 BIM 101 Overview - From Hand Drawings, CAD and now BIM
08/12/08 Draper, Inc. on BIM Object Developments
07/08/08 IFD Library Partners work to establish standards for creators of BIM software
06/23/08 Architectural Education
06/17/08 Parametric Revit Objects – Part I - Fundamentals
06/17/08 Window Glazing Coefficients
06/01/08 Frequently Asked Questions About Building Codes
06/05/08 Calling All Current and Prospective Revit Users - This Blog Is For You
05/06/08 System Requirements for SmartBIM Library
05/06/08 SmartBIM Library 2.0 Release Notes
05/05/08 Building Information Modeling Moves into AEC Mainstream, Adding Value to Project Delivery Process
04/08/08 Flooring: Cost Considerations
02/08/10 General Contractors & Trade Contractors
01/24/08 Building Element Models (BEM)
12/21/07 LEED Certification Primer
12/13/07 Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV)
09/24/07 Mixed-mode Building Design Combines Old and New Ideas
10/15/07 Checklists Identify Potential Envelope Design Improvements
10/24/07 Greenroofs as High Performance Design
10/21/07 What Makes a Building Product Green
10/24/07 Lighting Considerations in Green Building
10/24/07 Water Conservation in Green Buildings
10/24/07 Rainwater Collection Systems
10/24/07 Efficient Cooling Methods for Green Buildings
10/24/07 Controlling Heat Transfer in Green Buildings
10/24/07 Limiting Heat Loss Through Windows
10/23/07 Formaldehyde Use in Building Construction
10/23/07 Using Plants to Improve Indoor Air Quality
11/05/07 Greening Healthcare
10/19/07 Daylighting Controls
10/19/07 Use of Windows, Skylights and Light Pipes in Daylighting
10/19/07 An Overview of Daylighting
10/19/07 An Overview of Solar Ventilation Air Heating
10/19/07 Types of Collectors for Solar Water Heating
10/19/07 An Overview of Solar Water Heating
10/19/07 Cooling Load Advoidance
10/19/07 Components of Passive Solar Heating Designs
10/19/07 An Overview of Passive Solar Heating
10/23/07 Improving Indoor Air Quality
10/19/07 An Overview of The LEED Rating System
10/19/07 Cost Considerations in Building Deconstruction
10/17/07 Building Deconstruction
10/25/07 Roofing Considerations in Green Building
10/19/07 Green Site Selection and Development
10/24/07 Reducing Energy Use in Buildings
10/17/07 Green Demolition
10/18/07 Integrating Solar Power Generation into Buildings using Thin Film PV
09/10/07 Compost Company Promotes Green Environment
03/31/06 Green Roof Sets An Example For Minneapolis Sustainable Design

CMD Group- construction industry news-image” title=