- Two Leading Economic Indicators Now Confuse as much as Clarify
- An Extraordinary Portrait of the New Homes Market in America’s 12 Largest Cities (Part 2)
- An Extraordinary Portrait of the New Homes Market in America’s 12 Largest Cities (Part 1)
- How Important is Foreign Trade to the U.S. and Canada?
- Who Wins and Who Loses in Today’s Oil Price and Currency Turmoil? (Part 2)
Construction Starts Stumble in First Month of New Year02/25/2014 by Alex Carrick
Reed Construction Data (RCD) announced today that the value of January construction starts, excluding residential contracts, fell 15.3% after declining in December as well, -13.3%. This year’s kick-off dollar volume, $18.6 billion, was the lowest since February 2013’s $16.4 billion.
In the five years prior to the latest reading, the average January versus December percentage change was -2.0%, ranging from +17.0% in 2010 to -11.3% in 2013.
Since the starts data are not seasonally adjusted (NSA), caution should be used in analyzing monthly movements. Year-over-year comparisons remove much of the seasonal effect. Starts this January were down 6.4% versus the opening month of last year.
The value of construction starts1 each month is summarized from RCD’s database of all active construction projects in the U.S., excluding residential work. Missing project values are estimated with RSMeans building cost models.
|Value of United States Construction Starts
January 2014 — Year to Date
(Reed Construction Data)
(Jan 204 vs
(Jan 2014 vs
|The table is based on not seasonally adjusted (NSA) data.
Source: Reed Construction Data (RCD).
Table: Reed Research Group and Reed Construction Data – CanaData.
Difficult winter weather so far this year has held back starts in many regions, especially in middle and eastern-America. Also, many of the latest statistics on the U.S. economy — including housing starts — have suffered some setbacks. Recent month-over-month total employment gains have been less than hoped for, although the number of on-site construction workers in January jumped by 48,000. The jobless rate in the sector, however, remains uncomfortably high, 12.3%.
Among the four major type-of-structure categories, commercial starts performed best month to month (+1.9%) in January. The two largest sub-categories within commercial both recorded increases in the latest month versus December of last year, with retail +9.6% and private office buildings +11.2%. Compared with January of 2013, the percentage changes aren’t as favorable, except for private office buildings, +184.1% or nearly three times as great. Retail starts in January 2014 over January 2013 were -65.1% and the total commercial grouping was -16.8%.
Manufacturing starts this January were -72.7% versus the final month of 2013 and -41.9% when compared with January of last year. In dollar volume, December was the strongest month last year for this construction category, with October a close runner-up. The other 10 months of 2013 averaged about the same as January of this year.
Institutional starts, which were -15.1% month to month in January, were pulled down by their largest sub-category (i.e., more than 50% of the total), schools and colleges at -22.1%. Hospital work is the second most important component of institutional work and it was a robust +54.7%. More impressively, year-over-year hospital starts were +238.7%. That helped to counter-balance a 29.0% year-over-year decline in school work, so that the year-over-year decline in total institutional was a relatively modest -4.0%.
Heavy engineering project starts in January were 19.3% down compared with December, but 4.3% ahead of January of last year. The most significant drops month over month occurred in water and sewage work, -17.3%, and roads and highways, -9.6%. There was also a 19.6% drop in the month-to-month dollar volume of bridge starts. The total “civil” category fared better year over year, +4.3%, with bridges +9.1% and the road/highway and water/ sewage sub-categories both down only modestly, -3.3% and -3.2% respectively.
In the last several months, two swift agreements reached by the Democrats and Republicans to deal with the deficit and debt problems have been an unexpected — i.e., after the standoff of last fall — and welcome surprise. These help establish a more reliable and stable economic environment in which business leaders can make appropriate investment decisions. They also set the public sector’s financial framework for important upcoming infrastructure projects.